Copy architecture docs, ADRs, storage domain specs, research, reviews, and 56 storage architecture tasks from the alkhub_ts monorepo. Adapt for standalone @alkdev/hub repo structure (src/ not packages/hub/). Sanitize all sensitive information: - Replace private IPs (10.0.0.1) with localhost defaults - Remove internal server hostnames (dev1, ns528096) - Replace /workspace/ private paths with npm package references - Remove hardcoded credentials from examples - Rewrite infrastructure.md without private network details Add Deno project scaffolding: deno.json (pinned deps), .gitignore, AGENTS.md, entry point. Migrate existing code stubs (crypto, config types, logger) with updated import paths.
53 lines
2.1 KiB
Markdown
53 lines
2.1 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
id: resolve-message-id-adr-contradiction
|
|
name: Resolve ADR-003 vs sessions.md on message IDs
|
|
status: completed
|
|
depends_on: []
|
|
scope: narrow
|
|
risk: high
|
|
impact: component
|
|
level: implementation
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Description
|
|
|
|
Three-way inconsistency on message IDs:
|
|
1. **ADR-003** states: "Parts and messages tables use sortable timestamp-based IDs instead of commonCols.id"
|
|
2. **sessions.md** defines `messages` using `commonCols` (UUIDv4)
|
|
3. **table-reference.md** only mentions `parts` for sortable IDs
|
|
|
|
The composite index `idx_messages_session_id_created_at_id` on `(session_id, created_at, id)` relies on `created_at` for ordering, making UUIDv4 sortable IDs unnecessary — but this contradicts ADR-003's stated rationale.
|
|
|
|
## Decision (D2)
|
|
|
|
**Option B chosen**: Amend ADR-003 to state that only `parts` uses sortable IDs. `messages` keeps UUIDv4 and relies on the composite index for ordering.
|
|
|
|
**Rationale**:
|
|
- Composite index provides efficient ordering without requiring sortable IDs on messages
|
|
- Simpler opencode conversation import — opencode uses UUIDv4 message IDs natively
|
|
- Parts benefit more from sortable IDs (they're frequently paginated/ordered within a message)
|
|
- The `created_at` column in the composite index provides the ordering property that sortable IDs would give
|
|
|
|
## Acceptance Criteria
|
|
|
|
- [ ] ADR-003 is amended: scope sortable IDs to `parts` only, explain that `messages` uses composite index for ordering
|
|
- [ ] The `messages` table column spec in sessions.md keeps `commonCols` (UUIDv4)
|
|
- [ ] table-reference.md note on sortable IDs is updated: only `parts` uses sortable IDs, `messages` uses composite index
|
|
- [ ] The ordering rationale is explicitly stated in ADR-003 amendment
|
|
- [ ] All three sources are consistent after changes
|
|
|
|
## References
|
|
|
|
- docs/reviews/storage-architecture-review-2026-04-21.md#C02
|
|
- docs/decisions/ADR-003
|
|
- docs/decisions/storage-spec-phase1-resolutions.md#D2
|
|
- docs/architecture/storage/sessions.md:42-46
|
|
- docs/architecture/storage/table-reference.md:48
|
|
|
|
## Notes
|
|
|
|
> To be filled by implementation agent
|
|
|
|
## Summary
|
|
|
|
> To be filled on completion |