Files
reverse-proxy/docs/architecture/open-questions.md
glm-5.1 68d27c4789 Triage implementation review findings and update architecture specs
Analyzed 29 findings from the implementation review (002-implementation-review.md)
and identified 8 architecture-level concerns requiring spec changes:

Architecture gaps addressed:
- C2: Added acme_contact field to config.md, tls.md, and operations.md.
  Let's Encrypt requires a contact email for production; the spec was missing
  this required field.
- C4: Added StaticConfig drift tracking requirement to config.md reload
  section. ConfigReloadHandle must update its stored StaticConfig after each
  successful reload to prevent stale warnings.
- W1: Updated shutdown sequence in operations.md to specify that server tasks
  should be joined (not aborted) during the drain window.
- W5: Added health check path collision note to proxy.md.
- W13: Clarified that access logging is always-on in operations.md.
- W14: Updated X-Forwarded-Proto description in proxy.md to clarify that it
  is always 'https' since the HTTP listener redirects rather than proxies.

New open questions added:
- OQ-08: Should /health use a less common path to avoid upstream collision?
- OQ-09: How should upstream_connect_timeout_secs be enforced?
- OQ-10: Should ACME contact email be a required config field?
- OQ-11: How should X-Forwarded-Proto be derived per-listener?
- OQ-12: Should request access logging be mandatory or optional?

The remaining 21 findings are implementation-level bugs, code quality issues,
or Phase 2 improvements that don't require architecture spec changes.
2026-06-11 15:04:09 +00:00

183 lines
8.0 KiB
Markdown

---
status: draft
last_updated: 2026-06-11
---
# Open Questions
## TLS
### ~~OQ-01: Should cipher suites be restricted beyond rustls defaults?~~
- **Origin**: [tls.md](tls.md)
- **Status**: resolved
- **Priority**: medium
- **Resolution**: Restrict cipher suites to match the nginx scope: four
ECDHE-AES-GCM suites for TLS 1.2 plus all TLS 1.3 suites. This provides
behavioral parity during migration. See ADR-012.
- **Cross-references**: ADR-005, ADR-012
### ~~OQ-02: What log format should fail2ban consume?~~
- **Origin**: [operations.md](operations.md), [proxy.md](proxy.md)
- **Status**: resolved
- **Priority**: high
- **Resolution**: Custom structured log format with `key=value` pairs and
`RATE_LIMIT` prefix. A corresponding custom fail2ban filter will be provided.
See ADR-007.
- **Cross-references**: ADR-007
### ~~OQ-07: Should per-site TLS overrides be supported for mixed ACME/manual domains?~~
- **Origin**: [tls.md](tls.md), [config.md](config.md)
- **Status**: resolved
- **Priority**: low
- **Resolution**: Resolved by introducing `[[listeners]]` configuration. Each
listener is an independent TLS endpoint with its own bind address, TLS config,
and site routing. This supports both deployment models: (1) shared-IP
multi-domain (one listener, SAN certificate, SNI routing) and (2) dedicated-IP
single-domain (multiple listeners, each with its own IP/cert/domain). Mixed
ACME/manual configurations are naturally supported since each listener has its
own TLS mode. See ADR-019.
- **Cross-references**: ADR-011, ADR-019
## Logging and Monitoring
### ~~OQ-03: Should the health check endpoint be on a separate port?~~
- **Origin**: [operations.md](operations.md)
- **Status**: resolved
- **Priority**: low
- **Resolution**: Add a configurable local health check port (default: 9900)
bound to `127.0.0.1` only. Health checks work even when TLS is misconfigured.
The main HTTPS `/health` endpoint remains available as a fallback. See
ADR-013.
- **Cross-references**: ADR-013
## Configuration
### ~~OQ-04: Should config reload support a Unix domain socket API in addition to SIGHUP?~~
- **Origin**: [config.md](config.md)
- **Status**: resolved
- **Priority**: low
- **Resolution**: Yes. Add a Unix domain socket admin API alongside SIGHUP.
The socket accepts a `reload` command and returns structured success/failure
responses. SIGHUP is retained as a fallback. See ADR-014.
- **Cross-references**: ADR-014
## Deployment
### ~~OQ-05: Should the proxy bind to multiple addresses or just one?~~
- **Origin**: [overview.md](overview.md)
- **Status**: resolved
- **Priority**: low
- **Resolution**: A single `bind_addr` per listener entry is sufficient. ADR-019
introduced `[[listeners]]`, where each listener has its own `bind_addr`. This
supports multiple bind addresses in a single process — one per listener —
without needing an array of addresses on a single listener. See ADR-016 and
ADR-019.
- **Cross-references**: ADR-016, ADR-019
## Proxy
### ~~OQ-06: Should upstream timeouts be configurable per-site?~~
- **Origin**: [proxy.md](proxy.md)
- **Status**: resolved
- **Priority**: low
- **Resolution**: Resolved by ADR-015. Per-site upstream timeout overrides with
sensible defaults (5s connect, 60s request). Optional fields in SiteConfig
that override global defaults when specified.
- **Cross-references**: ADR-015, ADR-017
### OQ-08: Should the `/health` path use a less common endpoint to avoid upstream collision?
- **Origin**: Implementation review finding W5, [proxy.md](proxy.md)
- **Status**: open
- **Priority**: medium
- **Resolution**: None yet. The proxy currently intercepts `GET /health` on all
hosts before host-based routing, which means any upstream application that
uses `/health` for its own health checks will have those requests silently
intercepted. Options: (1) Use a less common path like `/__health` or
`/healthz`; (2) Only intercept `/health` when the Host header doesn't match
any known site (fallthrough); (3) Make the health check path configurable
via `StaticConfig`. Option 1 is simplest for Phase 1. Option 3 is most
flexible long-term. The architecture spec (proxy.md, ADR-013) currently
specifies `/health` as a top-level route regardless of Host.
- **Cross-references**: ADR-013
### OQ-09: How should `upstream_connect_timeout_secs` be enforced?
- **Origin**: Implementation review finding W4, ADR-015, ADR-017
- **Status**: open
- **Priority**: medium
- **Resolution**: None yet. The architecture (ADR-015, ADR-017) specifies a
5-second default connect timeout separate from the request timeout, and
`SiteConfig` includes `upstream_connect_timeout_secs`. However, the
implementation only applies `upstream_request_timeout_secs` as a blanket
timeout covering the entire exchange. The hyper client handles TCP connect
internally, making a two-phase timeout harder to implement without custom
connect logic. Need to decide: (1) implement a two-phase timeout using
`tokio::time::timeout` for connect phase then request phase; (2) configure
the hyper client's `connect_timeout` parameter; or (3) accept the current
behavior for Phase 1 and add connect timeout enforcement in Phase 2.
- **Cross-references**: ADR-015, ADR-017
## Configuration
### OQ-10: Should ACME contact email be a required config field?
- **Origin**: Implementation review finding C2, [tls.md](tls.md), [config.md](config.md)
- **Status**: open
- **Priority**: high
- **Resolution**: None yet. Let's Encrypt requires a contact email for production
certificate requests. The current architecture spec does not include an
`acme_contact` field in `TlsConfig` or `ListenerConfig`. Without it, ACME
registration with Let's Encrypt production will fail. Options: (1) Add a
required `acme_contact` field to the TLS config within each `[[listeners]]`
entry that uses ACME mode; (2) Add a global `acme_contact` field shared
across all ACME listeners. Per-listener is more flexible but adds config
noise. Global is simpler for typical deployments. Need to update config.md
and tls.md.
- **Cross-references**: ADR-004
### OQ-11: How should `X-Forwarded-Proto` be derived per-listener?
- **Origin**: Implementation review finding W14, [proxy.md](proxy.md)
- **Status**: open
- **Priority**: medium
- **Resolution**: None yet. The architecture spec (proxy.md) states
`X-Forwarded-Proto` should be "determined by which listener port received the
request" — `https` for requests on the listener's `https_port`, `http` for
requests on the listener's `http_port`. The implementation hardcodes
`is_https: true` in `ProxyState`. For a TLS-terminating reverse proxy this
is correct (all TLS connections arrive on the HTTPS port), but the HTTP
redirect listener should set `X-Forwarded-Proto: https` since it redirects to
HTTPS. Need to clarify: (1) The HTTPS listener always sets `X-Forwarded-Proto:
https` (correct, since it terminates TLS); (2) The HTTP redirect listener
sends a 301 redirect and does NOT proxy, so `X-Forwarded-Proto` on the
redirect response is not applicable. The hardcoded behavior is correct but
should be documented.
- **Cross-references**: ADR-021
## Operations
### OQ-12: Should request access logging be mandatory or optional?
- **Origin**: Implementation review finding W13, [operations.md](operations.md)
- **Status**: open
- **Priority**: high
- **Resolution**: None yet. The architecture spec (operations.md) defines an
access log format (`REQUEST client_ip=... host=... method=... path=...
status=... upstream=... duration_ms=...`) and a `log_request!` macro, but
the implementation does not emit access logs. Without request-level logging,
the proxy is operationally blind — there is no observability into traffic,
response codes, or upstream latency. This also blocks fail2ban integration
for access-log-based jails. The question is whether to: (1) Make access
logging mandatory (always-on at `info` level); (2) Make it configurable
(e.g., `access_log` boolean in `LoggingConfig`); or (3) Tie it to the
existing `log_file_path` setting. The architecture spec implies it's always
on.
- **Cross-references**: ADR-007