Untangles the 'host owns the resource and proxies on top' posture for
tunnels:
- Protocol-crate levels assume the resource is owned by the other side
of the connection; alkcall's existing op-level ACL applies as-is. No
new policy layer, target allowlists, or tunnel-specific ownership
machinery. Proxy/overlay is a downstream (assembly-layer) concern
(hub workers expose tunnels; hub overlays them per-ACL).
- Discovery resolved: openable channels are operations (alkcall
ADR-047), so the existing bidirectional ACL-filtered ops listing IS
tunnel-resource discovery. A consumer learns a socks5/postgres/redis
tunnel is available from the same listing it already uses for ops.
- -D simplifies to 'just tunnel a socks5 connection': socks5 server
lives on the producing side; target selection happens in the socks5
protocol, not tunnel params; the dynamic-target policy residue
dissolves (socks5 resource ACL governs reachability).
Residue for Phase 1: per-resource metadata in the ops listing
(substrate type, name/description) — an alkcall ADR-047 interaction,
not a new mechanism. OQ-TN-01 discovery residue and the hub-model
residue list cross-linked accordingly.
Four corrections from discussion:
- ALPN prefix: alknet/ -> alk/ swap happened in alkcall v0.1.1; docs
must not perpetuate the old prefix (consumers would bake it in)
- XY problem: except in the -D/dynamic composition case, params only
identify a produced resource + substrate discriminator (tcp/udp/
extensible); the producer owns where the resource comes from (most
likely a local port); UDP must be structurally supported even
though TCP dominates expected use
- self-contained JSON open-op object accepted as the params path
(alktty NegotiateRequest precedent)
- russh has no UDP channel support at all — no direct-udp prior art;
noted in OQ-TN-02 and the survey list; SOCKS5 relevance scoped to
the -D composition path
Residue for OQ-TN-01: resource naming shape, discovery mechanism,
exact JSON layout (Phase 1 ADR before first consumer).
Captures the standing hub stance as prior art: the hub owns the
connection and explicitly proxies to expose resources for others.
Role follows the resource — whoever reaches the target is the producer
(registers openable channels), whoever wants bytes is the consumer.
SSH -L/-R collapse to the same producer/consumer pair with the entry
point on different machines (assembly-layer wiring); the exposed port
is a virtual ACL-scoped resource (register_openable shape), not a
bind; the hub proxy is a producer wrapping a consumer, terminating
and re-producing per hop so ACL applies per hop (distinct from
ADR-042 transparent relay); -D composes as a consumer opening
channels with per-connection dynamic targets.
OQ-TN-03 resolved. OQ-TN-04 mostly resolved (binding always
assembly-layer, optional, either side). OQ-TN-01 reframed: params
name a produced resource — resource naming + discovery added. OQ-TN-08
strengthened: register_openable per-resource registration is the
primary gate; remaining residue is the dynamic-target policy hook.
OQ-TN-05 gains the hub re-produce composition sub-question. OQ-TN-02
cross-linked: endpoint-at-open aligns with resource naming; per-
datagram addressing matches the -D composition path.
Documents the previously-undocumented UDP gateway prior art discussed
with the alknet-channels POC agent (/workspace/tun2proxy/src/udpgw.rs):
per-datagram length framing over a stream (LEN|FLAGS|CONN_ID|[SOCKS5
addr]|DATA), SOCKS5 ATYP addressing in-band, CONN_ID flow multiplexing,
keepalive/ERR flag packets, MTU cap, idle expiry. Folds implications
into OQ-TN-01 (addressing fork: per-channel vs per-datagram), OQ-TN-02
(framing mechanics production-proven; remaining fork documented),
OQ-TN-07 (single-ALPN option strengthened), OQ-TN-09 (flag-packet
vocabulary maps to establishment/error frame question), OQ-TN-10 (UDP
POC scope narrowed to channels-layer fit), and the survey checklist.
Also records the transport story: TCP vs QUIC is the alkcall layer's
concern; the tunnel crate is transport-agnostic.
Captures the ten open design questions from the setup discussion:
addressing format, UDP datagram semantics, -L/-R/-D direction model,
no-forced-binding API surface, backend inversion point, two-pump
helper extraction, ALPN strategy, access control scope, lifecycle/
error reporting, and candidate targeted POCs. Includes the settled
foundation (POC-validated prior art), a prior-art survey list, and
the Phase 0 convergence checklist.
glm-5.3-flash